Unmasking the Misconception: Strength Doesn't Equate to Lack of Vulnerability
Article Title: Marcus Aurelius and Michael Collins: Emotional Leaders, Not Weak Ones
Marcus Aurelius, the Roman Emperor, and Michael Collins, the Irish revolutionary leader, both known for their strength and resilience, were not immune to emotional responses, contrary to popular belief. Despite shedding tears, these great leaders were not considered weak or out of control.
According to biographers, Marcus Aurelius, a well-known historical figure, often cried, challenging the traditional image of a 'good Stoic' who is disciplined and emotionless. However, his emotional reflection aligns with Stoic philosophy, which values rational control over feelings rather than their complete suppression.
Stoicism, as practiced by Marcus Aurelius, does not forbid emotional expression but teaches managing emotions through reason and focusing on what is within one’s control. Emotional expression in Stoicism is about acknowledging feelings without being controlled by them; this enables resilience and clear decision-making under adversity. Marcus Aurelius’ writings reveal a balance between emotional honesty and Stoic detachment, which bolstered his capacity to lead effectively rather than indicating vulnerability or weakness.
Michael Collins, like Marcus Aurelius, was not considered hysterical due to his emotional responses. Frank O'Conner, the biographer of Michael Collins, noted that Ireland's great hero was not above tears. If he had recorded all of Michael Collins' tears, it would have given the impression that he was emotional, but this was not the case. Collins laughed and cried without self-consciousness, similar to how people in earlier centuries seemed to behave.
The human nature of great leaders, including Marcus Aurelius, is a testament to their strength and resilience, not their weakness. It is possible for a leader to feel overwhelmed but not let that feeling prevent them from taking future action. Emotional responses, such as crying, do not equate to a lack of courage or discipline.
In conclusion, it is not weakness to get things out with a cry every once in a while, as long as it does not lead to self-pity or inaction. The biography of Michael Collins suggests that it is possible for a leader to be emotional and still be respected and effective. Marcus Aurelius' emotional reflection implies Stoicism endorses disciplined emotional awareness, not emotional suppression, reinforcing the view that emotional expression, when tempered by reason, is compatible with strong, resilient leadership.
References: 1. Marcus Aurelius' Meditations 2. Michael Collins: The Man and the Legend 3. The Stoicism of Marcus Aurelius 4. Emotions and Stoicism 5. Stoicism and the Art of Happiness
Science research in the field of emotional leadership could delve into analyzing the significance of mental health in personal growth and self-development, concluding that emotional expression, when managed with reason, fosters resilience and effective decision-making, aligning with the philosophies of Stoicism as demonstrated by both Marcus Aurelius and Michael Collins.
Health and wellness, including mental health, plays an essential role in education and self-development, with emotional honesty being a vital aspect that contributes to personal growth and strong, resilient leadership, as evidenced by figures such as Marcus Aurelius and Michael Collins.
