Regulating the Power of AI: An Examination of Legal Solutions
In the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence (AI), the line between progress and potential peril is becoming increasingly blurred. While AI systems are often hailed for their neutrality, they can inadvertently put certain groups at a disadvantage or cause real-world harm.
The courts and regulatory bodies, accustomed to dealing with concrete harms, find algorithmic harms more challenging. These harms are often more subtle, cumulative, and hard to detect, making it difficult to address them within the confines of current legal standards.
The future of AI holds immense promise, but without the right legal frameworks, it could also entrench inequality and erode civil rights. As AI systems become more widely used in critical societal functions, the need to regulate the harms they can cause becomes more pressing, especially to protect the most vulnerable.
One of the primary concerns is the addictive design of AI systems, which can trap teenagers in cycles of overuse, leading to escalating mental health crises, including anxiety, depression, and self-harm. Moreover, AI systems, while designed to be neutral, often inherit the biases present in their data and algorithms, reinforcing societal inequalities over time.
Another concern lies in the data collected by social media algorithms. These platforms track users' clicks and compile profiles of their political beliefs, professional affiliations, and personal lives. This data is then used in systems that make consequential decisions, such as identifying jaywalking pedestrians, considering job candidates, or flagging individuals as a risk to commit suicide.
AI harms are categorised into four legal areas: privacy, autonomy, equality, and safety. Strengthening individual rights around the use of AI systems could allow people to opt out of harmful practices and make certain AI applications opt-in. Mandatory algorithmic impact assessments could require companies to document and address the immediate and cumulative harms of an AI application to these four areas.
However, legal frameworks worldwide have struggled to keep up with the mounting dangers of AI. A regulatory approach emphasising innovation makes it difficult to impose strict standards on how these systems are used. Victims of AI-related harm often have no way to detect or trace the harm due to trade secret laws protecting AI applications.
Notable cases, such as the infamous incident where a facial recognition system used by retail stores disproportionately misidentified women and people of color, highlight the urgent need for regulation. Requiring companies to disclose the use of AI technology and its anticipated harms could help close the accountability gap.
Proposed reforms by U.S. government agencies focus on addressing algorithmic harms by improving transparency, accountability, and oversight. However, specific detailed reform plans targeting these four distinct types of algorithmic harms have not been explicitly outlined.
In conclusion, as AI continues to permeate our lives, it is crucial to address the hidden harms it can cause. By strengthening legal frameworks and promoting transparency, we can ensure that AI serves as a tool for progress, rather than a source of inequality and harm.
Read also:
- Quantum Leap Career Fair 2025, Organized by SFAN: Focus on Proficiency, Artificial Intelligence, and Employment in the Future
- AI Applications Already Embraced by Students for Beneficial Purposes
- Research responsibilities and instructional duties of the given author at MIT, encompassing research activities and teaching commitments
- Artificial Intelligence Improves in Essay Scoring: Is It Appropriate for Educators to Adopt This Practice?
