Prolonged restrictions by the Balochistan government deemed a setback for basic rights as per Pakistani perspective
In the heart of Balochistan, concerns are mounting over the government's recent actions, with critics arguing that they are eroding the basic freedoms of citizens.
The Balochistan Post, a local newspaper, reports that the repeated use of Section 144 and internet blackouts is less about security and more about silencing voices. The government's insistence on the necessity of these measures for security is being met with skepticism by critics.
The Balochistan government has extended Section 144 until September 14, a move that bans peaceful assemblies, sit-ins, rallies, and gatherings of more than five people. The order also criminalizes the use of masks or mufflers in public.
The repeated use of Section 144 and internet blackouts is a concern for The Balochistan Post, as it undermines the basic freedoms of citizens. The suspension of mobile internet services has occurred multiple times across Balochistan, causing distress and disruption to ordinary people.
The suspension of train services, such as the Jaffar Express, has restricted freedom of movement. Such arbitrary disruptions have left ordinary travellers stranded and vulnerable. The Balochistan High Court has issued a directive for the restoration of mobile internet services, but they have been suspended again.
Observers and rights defenders warn that these sweeping measures will fuel public resentment. They argue that these measures are designed to silence voices that demand justice, dignity, and equality. The Balochistan Post reports that the use of Section 144 and internet blackouts is a violation of people's right to access information.
The measures taken by the Balochistan government are cutting off families, businesses, students, and activists from essential communication. The Balochistan government's actions are seen as a means to suppress dissent, rather than address the roots of insecurity.
The Balochistan government's actions are drawing strong criticism from rights groups. Human rights organizations and opposition political leaders have the right to criticize the extension of Section 144, the suspension of mobile internet, and the halt of train services in Quetta due to concerns over restrictions on freedom of movement, communication rights, and the impact on civilians.
The Balochistan Post's analysis indicates that the government's actions are being perceived as a threat to freedom of speech and expression. The critics argue that these measures are designed to silence voices that question the government's actions and demand accountability.
As the situation in Balochistan continues to unfold, it is crucial to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and respect for human rights. The government must ensure that its actions are in the best interest of its citizens and do not infringe upon their basic freedoms.
Read also:
- Federal control looms over New York City as Trump's administration enacts policies detrimental to the city, potentially seizing control.
- Political Survey Classification: Distinctions Among Pre-Election, Exit-Poll, and Post-Election Surveys
- Reduced humanitarian aid intensifies worries among residents on Lake Chad's coastline, fragile areas already impacted by militant activities.
- Political Divide and Technological Influence in Election Strategies
