Political Divide and Technological Influence in Election Strategies
In today's digital age, technology has become an integral part of political campaigns, offering a platform for politicians to reach out to voters and gain support. However, this technological advancement has also contributed to the rise of political polarization, a state where politics has become deeply divided, and opposing sides often give inaccurate and inconsistent information.
One of the ways technology contributes to this polarization is through AI-powered deepfakes and misinformation. The deployment of AI-generated deepfake videos and content manipulation can sow distrust, conspiracy theories, and intensify polarization by producing misleading or emotionally manipulative material that targets partisan bases. For instance, AI deepfakes were used in Germany by far-right parties to evoke nostalgic sentiments, contributing to polarization.
Another way technology exacerbates political polarization is through psychological profiling and manipulation. AI models exploit personal data to target individuals with tailored messages, potentially steering voter choices and undermining the freedom of popular will. This can narrow exposure to differing viewpoints and reinforce ideological echo chambers, furthering polarization.
Moreover, technology facilitates ideological segregation online where individuals cluster in like-minded groups, reinforcing extreme views and reducing cross-cutting dialogue. This ideological sorting exacerbates political anger and distrust towards democratic institutions.
However, it's not all doom and gloom. There are strategies to mitigate these negative effects. Regulatory frameworks can govern and restrict the use of AI in political campaigns, banning manipulative practices and ensuring transparency and accountability. Digital literacy and inoculation education can expose individuals to manipulation techniques, enhancing their ability to critically discern misinformation. AI can also be harnessed to identify and flag misinformation, helping to protect the integrity of political discourse and empower voters with reliable information.
Independent oversight and civil society involvement are also crucial in maintaining democratic participation authenticity. Media outlets, non-profits, and activist groups can act as watchdogs to liberate digital spaces from undue influence of powerful actors (tech companies or governments).
In conclusion, while technology—especially AI—adds new complexities and risks to political polarization, a combination of regulatory, educational, technological, and civic strategies can help mitigate these negative effects and strengthen democratic resilience. It's essential for political parties to uphold democratic norms, foster inclusive discourse, and avoid strategies that damage social cohesion. After all, a divided electorate is not conducive to effective governance.
[1] Baum, M., Grose, C., & Howard, P. (2018). The rise of partisan news media and the polarization of the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 269-289.
[2] Ferrara, E., et al. (2016). Limiting the damage: A field experiment on reducing the spread of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13461-13466.
[3] Guess, C. M., et al. (2019). The role of digital technologies in political polarization: A systematic review. Journal of Political Ideologies, 24(1), 5-30.
[4] Karpf, D. (2018). Information politics: The struggle for communications in political campaigns. Cambridge University Press.
[5] Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Conformity and the law. Harvard University Press.
