Parents in Syktyvkar express dissatisfaction, as only a fourth of them are content with their children's academic outcomes.
In the city of Syktyvkar, the Unified State Exam (EGE) system, which serves as the standardized test for high school graduation and university admission, has sparked a range of opinions among its residents.
A recent survey conducted among economically active Syktyvkar residents, including parents of 11th grade school graduates, has revealed some intriguing insights. The survey found that 21% of parents positively evaluate the EGE system, while 73% express negative sentiments. Interestingly, 55% of economically active residents oppose the EGE system, with every second person voicing their dissent.
Support for the EGE system is higher among parents satisfied with their children's results, with 25% expressing support compared to 22% among the dissatisfied. This suggests that the satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the EGE results might influence the overall opinion towards the system.
Critics of the EGE system argue that it does not test real knowledge and creates unnecessary panic among students and parents. Conversely, supporters believe in equal access to universities, but only if the system is implemented correctly. Some argue that the EGE is relatively fair if the tasks are of equal difficulty everywhere.
Interestingly, the survey showed that women tend to support the EGE system more often than men (24% vs. 18%). Furthermore, the highest proportion of supporters is among young Syktyvkar residents under 35 (25%). This could be attributed to the fact that many young residents who support EGE have taken it and are familiar with its advantages.
However, 34% of parents are not satisfied with their children's EGE results, and 76% of parents not satisfied with their children's exam results call for the abolition of EGE. This indicates a significant concern among parents, who might worry about how well their children’s preparation aligns with university requirements, access to quality preparatory resources, and the fairness of exam administration.
In conclusion, opinions on the EGE system in Syktyvkar are varied, reflecting the complexities of the system and its impact on the city's residents. While some appreciate the EGE for creating a unified and transparent admission process, reducing corruption and favouritism, others express concern about the pressure it places on students, the stress of a single exam determining their future, and questions about whether it adequately reflects students' overall abilities.
More targeted local research or opinion polls would be beneficial to understand these sentiments more precisely. In the meantime, the mixed responses serve as a reminder of the ongoing debate surrounding the EGE system in Russia.
- The survey on EGE system's impact on Syktyvkar residents also gathered opinions on the role of education and self-development in general news, revealing a keen interest in understanding the efficacy of standardized tests like EGE in shaping the future of its students.
- The diverse opinions on the EGE system elicited by the survey are reflective of wider discussions on education and self-development within the realm of general news, suggesting a need for ongoing discourse and potential policymaking in this area.
