Skip to content

Nurse Suspended for Christian Beliefs: NHS Under Fire

Nurse Melle's suspension for using biologically accurate language has sparked a major debate about freedom of belief in the NHS. Political figures and unions are now involved.

This is an edited picture. In the center of the picture there is a woman's face with reflections.
This is an edited picture. In the center of the picture there is a woman's face with reflections.

Nurse Suspended for Christian Beliefs: NHS Under Fire

Jennifer Melle, a senior nurse at Epsom & St Helier University Hospital NHS Trust, remains suspended on full pay, with her career on the line. Despite the Trust's failure to provide evidence of wrongdoing, Melle's case has sparked controversy and drawn attention from various parties.

Melle was suspended for expressing her Christian beliefs and 'misgendering' a transgender paedophile patient. The Trust investigated her and issued a final written warning for not using the patient's preferred gender identity. However, Melle was punished for using biologically accurate language when consulting a doctor about the patient's care, despite the patient racially abusing her.

The Christian Legal Centre has supported Melle, advocating for her reinstatement and publicly criticizing the NHS and Health Minister Wes Streeting. Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of the Centre, describes Melle's case as a 'litmus test' for freedom of belief and speech in the NHS. The Darlington Nursing Union has also written to Health Secretary Wes Streeting, requesting a meeting to discuss Melle's case and the NHS's position on freedom of belief in the workplace.

Conservative Leader Kemi Badenoch has supported Melle and called for government intervention in her case. Meanwhile, the Trust has reported Melle to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) as a potential 'risk' to the public and the reputation of the NHS.

Jennifer Melle's suspension has raised significant questions about freedom of belief and speech within the NHS. With political figures and unions involved, the case is set to have broader implications for workplace policies and patient care.

Read also:

Latest