Construction initiates in the village of Rostov-on-Don for a new kindergarten.

Construction initiates in the village of Rostov-on-Don for a new kindergarten.

Lenivanka's Anger: Kindergarten vs Stadium

A Hot Button Issue: Since early 2025, the residents of Lenivanka find themselves embroiled in a contentious dispute with the authorities over the proposed construction of a kindergarten on the site of the local stadium. The the firebrand activist Tatiana Ivashchenko and the Communist Party deputy of Krasnokrymsky settlement, Irina Barbakova, sounding the alarm to "Regional Aspect" have been at the forefront of this controversy. Alongside townsfolk, they recorded a video plea to the president and penned a letter to the regional ministry of education, collecting the signatures of over 400 concerned citizens.

The Build Begin: On May 31, "Regional Aspect" reported the commencement of construction for a kindergarten on the site of Lenivanka's only school stadium. Local activist and former deputy of the Legislative Assembly of the Rostov region, Tatiana Ivashchenko, originally broke the news to the publication.

A Squeezed Town: An analysis of the area of Lenivanka (part of the Rostov agglomeration) reveals that, despite its tiny size of 2.52 square kilometers, it is overpopulated and filled with cottages. A dearth of essential services, such as kindergartens, schools, and facilities, has become a pressing concern for the townsfolk.

Unsuitable Spot: The disgruntled populace argues that the chosen site for the kindergarten is inappropriate. Although alternative locations exist in Lenivanka, the authorities have opted for the stadium construction to keep costs down.

Children's Playground: Tatiana Ivashchenko holds the school stadium as "the sole place in the settlement where children can play ball and engage in outdoor sports."

Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: Official responses from various institutions mimic the stance of local authorities: constructing a modular kindergarten on the stadium will expedite the resolution of the deficit of pre-school facilities. A letter signed by Igor Guskov, Rostov Oblast's First Deputy Governor, argues that building a capital children's garden would take four years.

"I suspect a closed circle of corruption-riddled collusion from top to bottom," Ivashchenko asserted. "Our reasonable arguments are met with manipulation of public opinion. Parents of Lenina are willing to wait a year or two, understanding that the child will go to school without a full-fledged stadium."

To halt construction, Ivashchenko twice held a picket near the regional government building but to no avail. In exchange, authorities promised to construct a sports ground on school premises, but its size would be significantly smaller than the stadium.

A Different Story: Meanwhile, Rostov-on-Don authorities are gearing up to renovate the Don Library for 2.17 billion rubles. However, architects and local historians criticize the project.

Lenivanka's Controversy: In examining the debate over constructing a kindergarten on Lenivanka's stadium, it's crucial to take into account several potential factors that fuel community discontent.

1. Community Spaces: Residents express concerns over the loss of a shared space that serves as a play area for both kids and adults. The transformation of the stadium into a kindergarten could mean a reduction in available communal spaces.
2. Support for Sports: The stadium is likely used by local sports teams or for community events. Such events might enjoy strong opposition from residents if the facilities are at risk of disappearing.
3. Urban Planning: The decision to convert the stadium could question the wisdom of the urban development strategy. Residents may worry about the impact on traffic, noise levels, or the aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood.
4. Needs Assessment: Concerns could arise over whether a kindergarten is truly needed in the area. Residents might argue that other community needs should take priority over childcare facilities if there are existing kindergartens nearby.
5. Environmental Impact: Depending on the design and construction plans, there could be worries about the environmental impact of the new building, such as increased energy consumption or changes to local ecosystems.
6. Transparency and Public Engagement: Residents might feel that the decision-making process lacked transparency or public input, which could lead to mistrust and opposition towards the project.
7. Alternative Solutions: Some residents might propose alternative solutions, such as finding another location for the kindergarten or exploring ways to coexist with the existing stadium.

To navigate these concerns deftly, local authorities should consider engaging more effectively with the residents through public forums, conducting thorough needs assessments, and fostering open communication during the decision-making process.

1. The residents of Lenivanka, in their plea for the preservation of their communal spaces, have raised concerns about the potential loss of the stadium, which serves as a play area for both children and adults, with its transformation into a kindergarten.
2. Another point of contention is the impact of the proposed kindergarten on the availability of sports facilities for local teams and community events, potentially sparking opposition from residents if these facilities were to be at risk of disappearing.

Read also: